|
German Version While on occasion of the sixtieth anniversary of the end of World War II and of the NS dictatorship everywhere efforts for a comprehensive well-balanced memory were made, there is still no common tradition about the "dismissal" of hundreds of Jesuit soldiers yet. There are two contrary statements: Documentarily proven a secret order was issued by Hitler in May 1941 to dismiss all called up Jesuits from the active military service and to transfer them as "n.z.v." (not serviceable) into the reserve status, i.e. - where the difference was observed - depending upon age into the Veteran Reserve II or into the Supplementary Reserve II. Regardless of this fact one can up to this day read and hear that the Jesuits had been dismissed from the army on Hitler's secret order "because of being ineligible for military service"; hence not only as "n.z.v.", and not from the For some people the argument about that thesis of "ineligibility" is an inconsequential controversy on words. For others it is only about a long disproved historical and legal legend which you can forget, and which would also do no honour to the Jesuits. But for the unswerving representatives of the ineligibility thesis it is about the interpretation: which has been the actual motive of Hitler, and which would have been the dangerous consequences of his secret order? Hence it is about the estimate that it did almost credit to the Jesuits to be considered as ineligible by such criminal dictators. It is unfortunate that thereto still no uniform tradition and phraseology has been found. Hence it shall be tried to reconcile the seemingly incompatible views by an explanation which can be understood and accepted by everybody (and which should finally become the future tradition and phraseology), and to show which meaning Hitler's secret order had in reality for the moral justification of the dismissed Jesuits.
The Facts Over the war years from the 537 German and 114 Austrian called up Jesuits only 343 German and 62 Austrian Jesuits were transferred into the reserve status, for either the secret order was not observed or it was not known that these soldiers were a Jesuits. Hitler's secret order took place in the context of the National Service Act of that time:
The term "ineligibility for military service" did not exist in the German language up to the introduction of the compulsory military service and the new National Service Act 1935, and since the end of World War II it is no longer used in the National Service Act. The term "ineligibility for military service" has been coined for the first time 1935 for the National Service Act, not as direct value term, but as criminal term for the exclusion from military service due to serious crimes, particularly because of anarchist activities, with adequate draconic penal consequences, e.g. loss of the civil rights, ineligibility for military service, complete exclusion from the armed forces (= from the military), and subsequent measures adequate to the ineligibility. The enforcement generally corresponded to the National Service Act:
An official letter of the Supreme Command Army/Berlin to Father Georg Deichstetter (19.5.1942) read: "Your dismissal, which is based on a decision of the Führer (Hitler), entails neither a diminution of honour nor the impairment of your eligibility for military service." - a still more express refutation of the 'ineligibility for military service'-thesis by the highest authority is not conceivable.
Interpretation If one states "ineligibility for military service" as reason for the Jesuits' dismissal "from the armed forces", then everybody who knows this term in its authentic military legal meaning will suppose that the Jesuits were in pursuance of most dangerous crimes sentenced to 'ineligibility for military service', and completely excluded from the armed forces. One can impute to the representatives of the NS regime that they would have charged only too gladly the Jesuits with "ineligibility for military service" in its authentic sense, i.e. because of dangerous anarchist activities - with the adequate criminal consequences. Were they unable or did they not want to do it? That they wanted to postpone the persecution of Jesuit soldiers till the "final victory" cannot be assumed, because many Jesuits outside of the armed forces had already become victims of the illegal NS dictatorship. On the contrary, the brown rulers - as prisoners of their own military law - met obviously with their limits within the armed forces. Not even one of more than 650 Jesuit soldiers could be sentenced by them to "ineligibility for military service" and dismissed completely from the armed forces because of heavy crimes, e.g. anarchist activities. According to the military law they could dismiss the Jesuits only from the active military service, and transfer them as "n.z.v." into the reserve status; even Hitler did not ignore the military law, and did not disregard it. But which was Hitler's motive for the secret order? His order did not hit the Jesuits like a bolt from the blue. It was only an escalation in the persecution of the feared and hated Jesuit order, for Hitler was afraid of and hated everything that had international relations. That was sufficient to judge the Jesuits as in the long run politically unreliable and therefore "ineligible for military service", also without provable subversive activities, which would have been the condition for the sentence "ineligibility for military service", and for the complete dismissal from the armed forces. The information which had been verbally reported to Brother Wellner (at that time in the Provincialate Cologne) sounds reliable, that Hitler - in reaction to Father Best's letter of complaint about the expulsion of Jesuits from their native houses in view of the engagement of hundreds of Jesuits in the armed forces - had said: "Kick them out, we don't need them!" Then the appropriate authorities had to see how that could be realized in the context of the military law.
About the Emergence of the "Ineligibility for Military Service" Thesis If the historical and legal facts are not known, considered, or interpreted sufficiently, and if you have only in view the regime's hostility against the church, it becomes understandable that many Jesuits interpreted the "dismissal" as dismissal "from the armed forces (= from the military) because of 'ineligibility for military service'". In the question after Hitler's motive the borderline between truth and misinterpretation is easily blurred, if one - thoughtlessly and against its authentic meaning - understands the term "ineligible for military service" in the sense of "not worth to defend his native country". One can interpret Hitler's motive in this figurative sense (see above), but then one should express it also with these words, and not wrongly with "ineligibility for military service", for this term meant quite different presuppositions, procedures, and consequences. It is a false conclusion, if one confounds cause and effect or even equates them: After the initial honourable (!) transfer of the Jesuits into the reserve status, which happened according to the military law, one had without doubt to reckon in the future with an illegal harassment (see above) of the dismissed Jesuits, hence with measures appropriate to the factual findings of "ineligibility for military service". But that does not justify the legend that there was from the beginning a "dishonourable dismissal from the armed forces because of 'ineligibility for military service'".
About the Importance of the Matter in Question According to my opinion it is of importance that the 'ineligibility for military service' thesis rather obscures substantial things instead of elucidating them, i.e. the moral justification of the Jesuit soldiers in relation to the regime and the regime's perversion of the law by using it against the Jesuits. Of course, everyone is allowed to hold the interpretation that in Hitler's view the Jesuits, because they were decided Christians, were - in the sense of the NS ideology - "not worthy" to defend the homeland, to get possibly even an military award, and, what is more, to undermine the military power. But if not even one Jesuit was found guilty of a dangerous crime by a military court, and therefore not even one of them could be dismissed from the armed forces according to the military law because of "ineligibility for military service" in the authentic sense, then
Result Hence in the interest of a uniform tradition that is acceptable for everyone one can put down in writing:
Historical Documents about the "Dismissal" of Jesuits from the Military ServiceDocuments as well of the Supreme Command of the armed forces as of the 'Reichsministerium für Wissenschaft, Erziehung und Volksbildung' (Ministry for Sciences and National Education) that have been found by the head of the archives of the German Province of the Society of Jesus, Dr. Clemens Brodkorb, in the Bundesarchiv Berlin, confirm the work of Father Erwin Bücken SJ about the question of the "dismissal" of Jesuit soldiers from the military service.
From: Bundesarchiv Berlin R/5101 -- 23316, Page 79 and 97
[zurück zu P. Otto Syres SJ - Kalendarium] |